Thursday, February 14, 2013

Character Vs. Character



There are not many authors who can handle such heavy topics quite as well as Graham Greene. After reading through a solid chunk of Greene’s work over the past few months, I have gained a strong appreciation for the ease with which Greene flawlessly integrates hard topics such as the transition from innocence to experience with lively storytelling.
One of the greatest examples of Greene’s ability to address heavy-handed topics in an entertaining fashion is Greene’s masterpiece, The Power and The Glory. In his novel, Greene is able to make a strong commentary on the status of the Church and on religion itself while at the same time entertaining the reader and not forcing any messages or ideals. I find that the way Greene is able to do this is through his use of different characters in order to express and represent different entities. One of his clearest examples of this is the old lady in jail with the whisky priest. Even though she is a minor character who only appears in one scene, Greene is able to frame her character and develop her just enough to show the reader how she represents those the whisky priest feels are misguided by religion. This is easily the factor in Greene’s writing that stuck with me the most and the same factor that I am trying to incorporate into my own writing. By allowing characters to develop freely and affect each other as the old lady affected the whisky priest allows for easier movement and progression in a story while being able to touch on sensitive subjects. Another thing that I enjoyed about Greene’s writing in particular was his use of characters that juxtaposed each other. Building off of the fact that Greene allows his characters to freely develop, he also likely to give the reader a greater understanding of a character by offering another view point from a starkly different character. Greene employs this technique in both The Third Man with Holly Martins and Harry Lime and in The Quiet American with Alden Pyle and Thomas Fowler. In both novels, the two opposing main characters challenge each other on moral issues allowing the reader to choose a side with two equally likeable characters.
Graham Greene is indeed the most interesting man in the world, and his unique writing style only confirms this. I encourage all to read The Quiet American in particular which combines two of Greene’s strongest writing techniques, both allow characters to organically grow and offering a foil character in order to challenge the development of another. Graham Greene will forever have a spot among my favorite authors of all time.

1 comment:

Brendan Emmons said...

I like Justin's observation about how there are often two characters in Greene's works who bump heads with regards to their world visions. For Harry Lime, the people of the world are extinguishable "dots" while for Martins the deformed children afflicted by the penicillin racket shake him to his core. The lieutenant lives a life of nearly "monastic" austerity while the whiskey priest initially lives one of indulgence. In giving the reader two clashing philosophies to align himself with, Greene brings the reader more fully into the conflict of the story. The character's ultimate fate gains more personal magnitude when his world vision aligns with the reader's own (if he/she choose to align him/herself with any character at all). But not all of Greene's characters remain fixed on their visions to novel's end. The lieutenant recognizes the futility of his rigid in categorizing humanity. The fact that Greene's characters undergo these moments of awakening not only affects the character him or herself, but the reader, maybe opening him or her to see the world in a new light. This is just another example of the power of Greene's literature to affect the minds and hearts of his readers.